Moved =(
I have moved... Right here.
Chief, you mind explaining what you're doing on that ship? Finishing the fight, sir.
http://health.asiaone.com/Health/News/Story/A1Story20070929-27667.html
Ignorance, something that many people hide behind. Not anymore... The health ministry is taking the 'ignorance is no excuse' approach to curb the spread of Aids, as educating the public on the HIV virus has proven ineffective.
It is proposing a change to the Infectious Diseases Act to put the onus on individuals, especially those in high-risk groups, to get themselves checked medically and to behave responsibly towards their sex partners.
The amendments, up for public consultation, will affect anyone who 'although unaware he is HIV-positive, has reason to believe he has been exposed to the risk of contracting HIV or Aids', said the Ministry of Health.
Risk groups would include people who have unprotected sex with multiple partners, share needles to inject drugs or have had sex with someone they later found out to be HIV-positive.
If the changes go through, they would be obliged not to engage in sex, unless they have taken at least one of the following measures:
- Warned their partners of the risk of contracting HIV from them, and gone ahead with sex only if their partners agreed to accept this risk.
- Taken an HIV test, been found negative, and not have engaged in risky behaviour exposing them to the virus between the time of the test and having sex with their partners.
- Taken 'reasonable precautions' during sex, such as using condoms.
Right now, the law states that a person who KNOWS that he or she has AIDS and does not inform his or her partner about it is committing a crime. The new approach on “ignorance is no excuse” will be placed on top of this existing law in a bid to curb the spread of AIDS. Even if the partner is not infected it is still an offence as long as the sexual act occurred. The maximum penalty for the offence will be raised, from a $10,000 fine and two years' jail, to a $50,000 fine and 10 years' jail.
Said the ministry's senior director of operations, Mr Koh Peng Keng: 'It's very easy to hide behind the veneer of 'I don't know'...but you have to be responsible for your actions.
'This law is to say: You have a responsibility to whoever you have sexual intercourse with, that you don't pass HIV to him or her.'
My view on this new law is that yes, this law should definitely be implemented. I feel that in order to curb the spread of AIDS, we should take some drastic measures. Last year, a record high of 357 people here were found to be HIV-positive. More than nine in 10 were infected through sex. This law will go a long way to making sure that the population can be AIDS free and someone can engage in sex without worrying in their minds that their partner might be infected with the fatal disease. In my opinion, the mindset of people who feel that they actually have AIDS has to be changed. If a person has AIDS, they would not want to admit it or even have it recorded down by others. They might feel very insecure about disclosing the fact that they have a fatal disease. This mindset is very common and the government should do something about it. Put yourself in the victim's shoes, would you rather your partner tell you about him or her having AIDS or keep mum about it? Think about it before you doing anything you might regret. This law as mentioned by Health Minister Khaw Boon Wan, is not to get into everybody's bedrooms. But it is to send a clear signal to those who are involved in high-risk sexual activities on what they need to do. I agree with Health Minister Khaw, as I feel the my principle in life is very simple, do not do onto others what you would not want them to do to you. Hopefully these people will get the message and go for regular testing and use some form of protection. If Singapore is to remain safe, we just have to rely on the people to know what is right for them and others.
Posted by
Tuckertooty
at
3:28 PM
0
comments
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7019359.stm
This article is on the protests that are going on in Burma. I have read up on BBC that these protests have been the result of the Burmese government deciding to increase the prices in fuel. The Prices of both petrol and diesel have doubled and the prices for compressed gas has risen fivefold. The hikes hit Burma's people hard, forcing up the price of public transport and triggering a knock-on effect for staples such as rice and cooking oil.
The monks started participating in large numbers after troops used force to break up a peaceful rally in the central town of Pakokku on 5 September. At least three monks were hurt. The next day, monks in Pakokku briefly took government officials hostage. They had given the government until 17 September to apologise, but the government did not apologise. When the deadline expired, the monks began protesting in even greater numbers and also withdrew their religious services to the government. There have been protests every day since the deadline, both in Rangoon and elsewhere, and they are getting bigger by the day. Tens of thousands of these monks are now involved. More and more Buddhist monks have been joining the marches. The participation of the monks is significant because there are hundreds of thousands of them and they are highly revered. The clergies, a historically prominent figure in Burma have remained silent so far, giving the signal that they are condoning such protests.
For some of the monks, yes. But for others, it has become more than just about the apology.
A group called the Alliance of All Burmese Buddhist Monks has emerged to co-ordinate the protests, and on 21 September it issued a statement describing the military government as "the enemy of the people". They pledged to continue their protests until they had "wiped the military dictatorship from the land of Burma", and they have called on people across Burma to join them. One rally marched past the house of detained pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi, clearly linking the monks' movement with a desire for a change of government.
My personal view is that these protests are very significant and maybe be “world changing” . I feel that the government had made a very bad choice by spiking up the prices to such an extreme in such a short period of time. The military also did not exercise enough care, injuring three monks. They also made another mistake by not apologising to the monks in Pakokku. They did not have the foresight that not apologizing to these monks would spark protests and alliance to overthrow the military dictatorship of the country. I feel that the officials who had made the decision to not apologise to the monks should not be blamed as they did not expect things to be blown up to such a scale. Hopefully the protests do not cause any problems to countries in the immediate area. Even the credit cards of these officials have been suspended. Hopefully all will be well soon and the country can recover from this ordeal without much difficulty, but right now, all we can do is to wait for the country to live through this turmoil.
Posted by
Tuckertooty
at
11:32 AM
0
comments
Ok, this is the 4th article I've got. The Article.
This article struck me particularly beacause i felt that such behaviour should not be tolerated. Paris Hilton had been put under 3 years probation after caught on a charge of alcohol related driving. At the time of the arrest, she had an alcohol level of 0.08% which was the minimum warrant for arrest. She was fined also fined $390. In February the 27th she was caught speeding with her car's headlights off and charged with violating her probation. Although she had claimed that she had no knowledge of her licence being suspended, a document which she had signed in January stating otherwise was found in her glove compartment. The hotel heiress was later sentenced to 45 days in jail. She was later senteced to 23 days in jail for good behaviour. She will spend this 23 days in a block with 12 cells, two people in one. This block would be for high profile offenders such as celebrities, public officials , police officers. The BBC's David Willis said that the austere surrounding of the prison cell would be far less comfortable than that of the 5 star hotel which she has become used to. If she does not report to jail by June 5th she will be sentenced to 90 days in jail. I feel that alot is too be learnt in that the law comes above the rest- she still faces a sentece-. Money cannot buy over the law -It should be that way-. Yet, the law can be bent for such people. Normally a person driving under the influence of alcohol would receive up to 6 months of jail yet she only received 45 days despite violating the law twice. This shows alot on how our society fuctions. Personally i feel that this woman is a very bad example due to her undesirable behaviour and how she denied knowing that her licence was suspended. I also felt that the innocent side of her that she had shown during court and during her arrest was a fraud as she knew that she was violating the law by driving. Reading the article, I also felt that her mother had displayed very inappropriate behavior as she had shouted at the judge and displayed her displeasure very openly when the judge had made his decision. This shows alot on how even though a person can be rich and famous, she might not be as good mannered and well brought up as some people.
Posted by
Tuckertooty
at
10:00 PM
0
comments
I'm damn bored but have to post on this blog. NO choice.
This is the 3rd article I think.
The site
This article is basically about the Critics (US and other countries against China financing and assisting Sudan) trying to boycott the 2008 Olympics being held in China. Human rights groups and some European and US politicians have asked for the 2008 Olympics in China to be boycotted on the fact that China is selling arms to Sudan-Despite the fact that China is fully aware that Sudan is using these weapons in the conflict against Sudan-. The article provides little information on the situation in Sudan so I went to search more about it. Deeper Insight Apparently Sudan is causing violence and bloodshed in Darfur and China is one of Sudan's main trading partners, boosting its oil industry and selling them arms. The international community have voiced their displeasure at this. China is caught in a very difficult situation as it does value its relationship and trade ties with Sudan yet tries to satisfy the expectations of the international community. The article mentions the close ties between China and Sudan. Them being very close trade partners, China trades arms with Sudan and in exchange Sudan provides China with a large percentage of the oil that they produce. China might even be getting the now valuable oil at reduced prices. Actually what China is doing is not wrong. China should not be blamed for trading their weapons with Sudan. This is considered legal as it observed the UN restrictions. But, is these weapons were to be used in Darfur then China should stop its weapons trade with Sudan immediately. Even some celebrities have been adding on to the pressure on China by voicing their concerns over the situation in Darfur. Having to make a decision, China is in a very difficult spot. China seems to have gotten the point as it has recently appointed a new foreign minister and an envoy for Darfur. It seems to be aware that what it is doing is wrong and the situation needs to be rectified. Despite all this, China seems to be confident that the boycott of the 2008 Olympics will fall through on the claim that it would be against the spirit of the game and the aspirations of the people on a global scale. Although Chin has been accused of breaching a UN embargo by continuing to supply arms to Sudan which alledgedly is using them to do battle in Darfur. Although China has denied the claims, it had since appointed a special envoy for Darfur. This sounded very contradictory as China would not feel guilty unless it had the knowledge that Sudan was indeed utilising its weapons against Darfur. Overall, I feel that China should stop this trade with Sudan for the sake of the imternational community and the people of Darufur. It should also try to persuade Sudan to tome down its siege on Darfur -best be to stop it totally-.
Posted by
Tuckertooty
at
9:45 PM
0
comments