Ok, this is the 4th article I've got. The Article.
This article struck me particularly beacause i felt that such behaviour should not be tolerated. Paris Hilton had been put under 3 years probation after caught on a charge of alcohol related driving. At the time of the arrest, she had an alcohol level of 0.08% which was the minimum warrant for arrest. She was fined also fined $390. In February the 27th she was caught speeding with her car's headlights off and charged with violating her probation. Although she had claimed that she had no knowledge of her licence being suspended, a document which she had signed in January stating otherwise was found in her glove compartment. The hotel heiress was later sentenced to 45 days in jail. She was later senteced to 23 days in jail for good behaviour. She will spend this 23 days in a block with 12 cells, two people in one. This block would be for high profile offenders such as celebrities, public officials , police officers. The BBC's David Willis said that the austere surrounding of the prison cell would be far less comfortable than that of the 5 star hotel which she has become used to. If she does not report to jail by June 5th she will be sentenced to 90 days in jail. I feel that alot is too be learnt in that the law comes above the rest- she still faces a sentece-. Money cannot buy over the law -It should be that way-. Yet, the law can be bent for such people. Normally a person driving under the influence of alcohol would receive up to 6 months of jail yet she only received 45 days despite violating the law twice. This shows alot on how our society fuctions. Personally i feel that this woman is a very bad example due to her undesirable behaviour and how she denied knowing that her licence was suspended. I also felt that the innocent side of her that she had shown during court and during her arrest was a fraud as she knew that she was violating the law by driving. Reading the article, I also felt that her mother had displayed very inappropriate behavior as she had shouted at the judge and displayed her displeasure very openly when the judge had made his decision. This shows alot on how even though a person can be rich and famous, she might not be as good mannered and well brought up as some people.
War Pics
Sunday, May 20, 2007
3rd Article
I'm damn bored but have to post on this blog. NO choice.
This is the 3rd article I think.
The site
This article is basically about the Critics (US and other countries against China financing and assisting Sudan) trying to boycott the 2008 Olympics being held in China. Human rights groups and some European and US politicians have asked for the 2008 Olympics in China to be boycotted on the fact that China is selling arms to Sudan-Despite the fact that China is fully aware that Sudan is using these weapons in the conflict against Sudan-. The article provides little information on the situation in Sudan so I went to search more about it. Deeper Insight Apparently Sudan is causing violence and bloodshed in Darfur and China is one of Sudan's main trading partners, boosting its oil industry and selling them arms. The international community have voiced their displeasure at this. China is caught in a very difficult situation as it does value its relationship and trade ties with Sudan yet tries to satisfy the expectations of the international community. The article mentions the close ties between China and Sudan. Them being very close trade partners, China trades arms with Sudan and in exchange Sudan provides China with a large percentage of the oil that they produce. China might even be getting the now valuable oil at reduced prices. Actually what China is doing is not wrong. China should not be blamed for trading their weapons with Sudan. This is considered legal as it observed the UN restrictions. But, is these weapons were to be used in Darfur then China should stop its weapons trade with Sudan immediately. Even some celebrities have been adding on to the pressure on China by voicing their concerns over the situation in Darfur. Having to make a decision, China is in a very difficult spot. China seems to have gotten the point as it has recently appointed a new foreign minister and an envoy for Darfur. It seems to be aware that what it is doing is wrong and the situation needs to be rectified. Despite all this, China seems to be confident that the boycott of the 2008 Olympics will fall through on the claim that it would be against the spirit of the game and the aspirations of the people on a global scale. Although Chin has been accused of breaching a UN embargo by continuing to supply arms to Sudan which alledgedly is using them to do battle in Darfur. Although China has denied the claims, it had since appointed a special envoy for Darfur. This sounded very contradictory as China would not feel guilty unless it had the knowledge that Sudan was indeed utilising its weapons against Darfur. Overall, I feel that China should stop this trade with Sudan for the sake of the imternational community and the people of Darufur. It should also try to persuade Sudan to tome down its siege on Darfur -best be to stop it totally-.
Posted by
Tuckertooty
at
9:45 PM
0
comments