Halo 3 Hayabusa - Spare No One

Saturday, September 29, 2007

Article 6 Radical Approach to tackle the spread of AIDS

http://health.asiaone.com/Health/News/Story/A1Story20070929-27667.html

Ignorance, something that many people hide behind. Not anymore... The health ministry is taking the 'ignorance is no excuse' approach to curb the spread of Aids, as educating the public on the HIV virus has proven ineffective.
It is proposing a change to the Infectious Diseases Act to put the onus on individuals, especially those in high-risk groups, to get themselves checked medically and to behave responsibly towards their sex partners.
The amendments, up for public consultation, will affect anyone who 'although unaware he is HIV-positive, has reason to believe he has been exposed to the risk of contracting HIV or Aids', said the Ministry of Health.
Risk groups would include people who have unprotected sex with multiple partners, share needles to inject drugs or have had sex with someone they later found out to be HIV-positive.
If the changes go through, they would be obliged not to engage in sex, unless they have taken at least one of the following measures:
- Warned their partners of the risk of contracting HIV from them, and gone ahead with sex only if their partners agreed to accept this risk.
- Taken an HIV test, been found negative, and not have engaged in risky behaviour exposing them to the virus between the time of the test and having sex with their partners.
- Taken 'reasonable precautions' during sex, such as using condoms.
Right now, the law states that a person who KNOWS that he or she has AIDS and does not inform his or her partner about it is committing a crime. The new approach on “ignorance is no excuse” will be placed on top of this existing law in a bid to curb the spread of AIDS. Even if the partner is not infected it is still an offence as long as the sexual act occurred. The maximum penalty for the offence will be raised, from a $10,000 fine and two years' jail, to a $50,000 fine and 10 years' jail.
Said the ministry's senior director of operations, Mr Koh Peng Keng: 'It's very easy to hide behind the veneer of 'I don't know'...but you have to be responsible for your actions.
'This law is to say: You have a responsibility to whoever you have sexual intercourse with, that you don't pass HIV to him or her.'
My view on this new law is that yes, this law should definitely be implemented. I feel that in order to curb the spread of AIDS, we should take some drastic measures. Last year, a record high of 357 people here were found to be HIV-positive. More than nine in 10 were infected through sex. This law will go a long way to making sure that the population can be AIDS free and someone can engage in sex without worrying in their minds that their partner might be infected with the fatal disease. In my opinion, the mindset of people who feel that they actually have AIDS has to be changed. If a person has AIDS, they would not want to admit it or even have it recorded down by others. They might feel very insecure about disclosing the fact that they have a fatal disease. This mindset is very common and the government should do something about it. Put yourself in the victim's shoes, would you rather your partner tell you about him or her having AIDS or keep mum about it? Think about it before you doing anything you might regret. This law as mentioned by Health Minister Khaw Boon Wan, is not to get into everybody's bedrooms. But it is to send a clear signal to those who are involved in high-risk sexual activities on what they need to do. I agree with Health Minister Khaw, as I feel the my principle in life is very simple, do not do onto others what you would not want them to do to you. Hopefully these people will get the message and go for regular testing and use some form of protection. If Singapore is to remain safe, we just have to rely on the people to know what is right for them and others.

5th Article Protests in Burma

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7019359.stm

This article is on the protests that are going on in Burma. I have read up on BBC that these protests have been the result of the Burmese government deciding to increase the prices in fuel. The Prices of both petrol and diesel have doubled and the prices for compressed gas has risen fivefold. The hikes hit Burma's people hard, forcing up the price of public transport and triggering a knock-on effect for staples such as rice and cooking oil.

The monks started participating in large numbers after troops used force to break up a peaceful rally in the central town of Pakokku on 5 September. At least three monks were hurt. The next day, monks in Pakokku briefly took government officials hostage. They had given the government until 17 September to apologise, but the government did not apologise. When the deadline expired, the monks began protesting in even greater numbers and also withdrew their religious services to the government. There have been protests every day since the deadline, both in Rangoon and elsewhere, and they are getting bigger by the day. Tens of thousands of these monks are now involved. More and more Buddhist monks have been joining the marches. The participation of the monks is significant because there are hundreds of thousands of them and they are highly revered. The clergies, a historically prominent figure in Burma have remained silent so far, giving the signal that they are condoning such protests.
For some of the monks, yes. But for others, it has become more than just about the apology.
A group called the Alliance of All Burmese Buddhist Monks has emerged to co-ordinate the protests, and on 21 September it issued a statement describing the military government as "the enemy of the people". They pledged to continue their protests until they had "wiped the military dictatorship from the land of Burma", and they have called on people across Burma to join them. One rally marched past the house of detained pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi, clearly linking the monks' movement with a desire for a change of government.

My personal view is that these protests are very significant and maybe be “world changing” . I feel that the government had made a very bad choice by spiking up the prices to such an extreme in such a short period of time. The military also did not exercise enough care, injuring three monks. They also made another mistake by not apologising to the monks in Pakokku. They did not have the foresight that not apologizing to these monks would spark protests and alliance to overthrow the military dictatorship of the country. I feel that the officials who had made the decision to not apologise to the monks should not be blamed as they did not expect things to be blown up to such a scale. Hopefully the protests do not cause any problems to countries in the immediate area. Even the credit cards of these officials have been suspended. Hopefully all will be well soon and the country can recover from this ordeal without much difficulty, but right now, all we can do is to wait for the country to live through this turmoil.